Thursday, October 18, 2007

Question 5

Q: What, to you, is a definition of portraiture? Does it necessarily involve a naturalistic likeness?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Since physical attributes are only one part of a person, a portraiture should focus on more than just the anatomy of the head. The personality and spirituality of that person should be given much greater consideration than their appearance. Picasso often drew himself as a bull for that very reason.

Anonymous said...

yes! I think that now, anything at all can make a portrait. I could be sick into a big bowl and call it a self portrait. (mmmm) Then that could speak about my own self-image, the tortured and nervous artist's ego, or maybe i am bulemic... My friend took a nice photo of his dad's three corvettes and called it "the kids," although i suppose that one was more about the dad than the children. :) But faces are so endless in possibility and in reading. An interesting portrait of my face would be far more ambiguous in terms of interpretation than my barf bowl. :) But I guess my point is that I don't think there are any limits...